We read in Revelation about things that must happen in the Last Days:

Rev 13:15-18 And there was given to it to give a spirit to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast might both speak, and might cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. (16) And it causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark on their right hand, or in their foreheads, (17) even that not any might buy or sell except those having the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of its name. (18) Here is the wisdom. Let him having reason count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. And its number is six hundred and sixty-six.


This Blog deals with the Mark of the Beast and to link current world events and Technology with end time prophecy to see where we stand in regarding to the return of Jesus Christ / Messiah Yeshua.

We will look at technology that supports this passage as well as the "changing" of humanity through Transhumanism and population reduction and how technology and food engineering help the elite to reach their goal of 500 Mil people on he Earth.

Wednesday 27 July 2011

27/7/11 - British scientists want regulation for human-animal, "Frankenstein-like" experiments


British scientists are concerned human DNA experiments with animals could cause them to develop human-like features
 (Credit: CBS)
(CBS/AP) From sheep with human livers to cows whose udders yield human breast milk, scientists have created all sorts of animal-human hybrids. But now a group of British scientists is calling for a regulatory oversight committee because of the "'Frankenstein fear' that the medical research which creates 'humanized' animals is going to generate monsters," The Telegraph reported.
The UK-based Academy of Medical Sciences based their recommendation based on evidence from academics, the U.K. government, animal welfare groups, and a survey to gauge public opinion. The government-picked expert committee would decide whether certain tests that use human DNA on animals are ethically sound, and should be allowed.
Martin Bobrow, chair of the academy said tighter regulation isn't needed for most of these experiments. "But there are a small number of future experiments, which could approach social and ethically sensitive areas which should have an extra layer of scrutiny," he told reporters in London.
Experiments that might spark concern are those where human brain cells might change animal brains, where human eggs are fertilized in animals, and any modifications of animals that might create at uniquely human attributes, like facial features, skin or speech.
Dr. Christopher Shaw of the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London told Reuters, "If you come home and your parrot says 'Who's a pretty boy?' that's one thing. But if your monkey says it that's something else."
Some experts think regulating human DNA experiments in animals could impede medical advancements. Robin Lovell-Badge, head of stem cell biology and developmental genetics at Britain's Medical Research Council said injecting human brain cells into the rats' brains might lead to new stroke treatments, or that growing human skin on mice could further skin cancer research.
What do you think? Could this regulatory panel slow the pace of medical advances?

No comments:

Post a Comment